Corrections
This is wrong.
Thirty-nine reviewed groups and seventy-four cues, drawn and written by people who are not standing in your river. Some of it will be wrong, and the drawings are the most likely place — they are authored illustrations, not photographs of your water.
There is no server behind this page, so this form does not submit anything. It assembles a report you can copy, save, or hand to your own mail client. That is deliberate: the alternative is a feedback endpoint, and an application that promises nothing leaves your device should not quietly grow one.
Separator (aquatic-worms)
Bristle bundles along the segments and no suckers is an aquatic worm. Suckers and no bristles is a leech. The pair is reciprocal, but the bristles are often too fine to see, so check the suckers first.
Cited for this statement: UMW-AQUATIC-INVERTS, MDC-TUBIFICID-WORMS. The report names this statement exactly, so nobody has to find it again.
The whole report, exactly as it would travel
HATCH MATCH — CORRECTION REPORT Application: HTH-HM-001 Build: 0.19.1 · f244e24 Carrier schema: 11 Reference reviewed: 2026-09-25 Reported: 2026-11-06 Kind: not stated Subject: Leech Record id: hm-leech-forage-v1 Claim: guide.separators.0.tell Page: /guide/leech WHAT THE REFERENCE SAYS NOW Bristle bundles along the segments and no suckers is an aquatic worm. Suckers and no bristles is a leech. The pair is reciprocal, but the bristles are often too fine to see, so check the suckers first. Cited sources: UMW-AQUATIC-INVERTS, MDC-TUBIFICID-WORMS WHAT IS WRONG (not stated) WHAT IT SHOULD SAY (not stated) SOURCE (none given) Written locally. It contains only what the reporter typed — nothing was gathered automatically.
Pick a kind and write at least a sentence, and the report becomes worth sending.
Copying and saving work with no signal, and what you type is kept on this device until you send it or discard it. The support desk is a website and needs a connection.
What happens to it
Checked, or not used.
A correction changes the reference set only after it has been checked against a source. Where a claim cannot be supported either way, the entry loses the claim rather than gaining a hedge — an unsupported sentence removed is a better reference than an unsupported sentence qualified.